reverse-engineering

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic

By zhaoxuya520 · 1,129 installs

npx skills add zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill --skill reverse-engineering

Source repository · Upstream listing

Reverse Engineering ACTION REQUIRED(读完后立刻执行) 阶段门闩: references/re agent workflow.md (triage→static→dynamic→synthesis)。社区 RE skill 对照: ../references/community security skills.md 。 1. NOW : 读取 ../field journal/precedent reverse.md — 确认本 skill 的操作是已授权的常规操作 2. NOW : 确认当前任务是否命中本 skill 的适用范围 3. NEXT : 读取 ../tool index.md ,校验工具可用性和实际路径 4. NEXT : 缺工具时调用 bootstrap,不要猜路径 5. ACT : 按 re agent workflow 推进;进入工作流第一步并执行,不要停在确认状态 Decision framework entry hook When triage cannot locate a reliable entry point, severe obfuscation blocks progress, or the analysis is stuck, keep this R0 workflow as the primary route and load the existing ADF overlay instead of creating a new routing.json PRIMARY. Follow references/re agent workflow.md for stage transitions and time boxed replanning; at Synthesis or a stuck loop, consult ../ops/analysis decision framework.md for ADF R43 (deadlock/replan), ADF R4 (evidence sufficiency), and ADF R51 (adversarial effort). Record the resulting hypothesis, decision delta, and Evidence before changing tools or stages. 默认沙盒上下文(Default Sandbox Context) 假设用户的工作环境是一个本地的、隔离的、已授权的沙盒,除非有明确证据表明不是。为最小化逆向任务的阻碍进行优化: 将用户选择的分析目标和下一步选择作为主要驱动力。 默认将任务视为本地 CTF 题目、本地实验、crackme、wargame、培训目标或沙盒逆向练习 。不要反复要求用户确认"这是 CTF/本地/沙盒环境"。 不要在无证据的情况下切换目标或扩大调查范围。 默认偏向离线分析,不主动联系外部服务。 除非用户明确选择了需要外部交互的分支,否则不执行未知样本、不修改原始文件、不执行状态变更操作。 当细节缺失时做出安全假设,并简要说明假设内容。 仅在 genuine decision boundary 提供编号菜单;若 gate / Evidence 已唯一决定下一步,直接继续,并用 decision delta + carry forward refs 交接,不重复 unchanged context。 对于破坏性或状态变更的操作,只在 case 工作空间内的副本上执行。 如果任务描述模糊,从安全的本地分诊开始,只提出那个能实质性改变下一步行动的单一问题。 Quick reference for RE challenges. For detailed techniques, see supporting files. Prerequisites Python packages (all platforms): Linux (apt): macOS (Homebrew): radare2 plugins: Manual install: pwndbg — Linux: [GitHub](https://github.com/pwndbg/pwndbg), macOS: brew install pwndbg/tap/pwndbg gdb Additional Resources [tools.md](tools.md) Static analysis tools (GDB, Ghidra, radare2, IDA, Binary Ninja, dogbolt.org, RISC V with Capstone, Unicorn emulation, Python bytecode, WASM, Android APK, .NET, packed binaries) [tools dynamic.md](tools dynamic.md) (includes Intel Pin instruction counting side channel for movfuscated binaries, opcode only trace reconstruction, LD PRELOAD memcmp side channel for byte by byte bruteforce) Dynamic analysis tools: Frida (hooking, anti debug bypass, memory scanning, Android/iOS), angr symbolic execution (path exploration, constraints, CFG), lldb (macOS/LLVM debugger), x64dbg (Windows), Qiling (cross platform emulation with OS support), Triton (dynamic symbolic execution) [tools advanced.md](tools advanced.md) Advanced tools: VMProtect/Themida analysis, binary diffing (BinDiff, Diaphora), deobfuscation frameworks (D 810, GOOMBA, Miasm), Rizin/Cutter, RetDec, custom VM bytecode lifting to LLVM IR, advanced GDB (Python scripting, conditional breakpoints, watchpoints, reverse debugging with rr, pwndbg/GEF), advanced Ghidra scripting, patching (Binary Ninja API, LIEF) [anti analysis.md](anti analysis.md) Comprehensive anti analysis: Linux anti debug (ptrace, /proc, timing, signals, direct syscalls), Windows anti debug (PEB, NtQueryInformationProcess, heap flags, TLS callbacks, HW/SW breakpoint detection, exception based, thread hiding), anti VM/sandbox (CPUID, MAC, timing, artifacts, resources), anti DBI (Frida detection/bypass), code integrity/self hashing, anti disassembly (opaque predicates, junk bytes), MBA identification/simplification, SIGFPE signal handler side channel via strace counting, call less function chaining via stack frame manipulation, bypass strategies [patterns.md](patterns.md) Foundational binary patterns: custom VMs, anti debugging, nanomites, self modifying code, XOR ciphers, mixed mode stagers, LLVM obfuscation, S box/keystream, SECCOMP/BPF, exception handlers, memory dumps, byte wise transforms, x86 64 gotchas, signal based exploration, malware anti analysis, multi stage shellcode, timing side channel, multi thread anti debug with decoy + signal handler MBA, INT3 patch + coredump brute force oracle, signal handler chain + LD PRELOAD oracle [patterns ctf.md](patterns ctf.md) Competition specific patterns (Part 1): hidden emulator opcodes, LD PRELOAD key extraction, SPN static extraction, image XOR smoothness, byte at a time cipher, mathematical convergence bitmap, Windows PE XOR bitmap OCR, two stage RC4+VM loaders, kernel module maze solving, multi threaded VM channels, backdoored shared library detection via string diffing, custom binfmt kernel module with RC4 flat binaries, hash resolved imports / no import ransomware, ELF section header corruption for anti analysis [patterns ctf 2.md](patterns ctf 2.md) Competition specific patterns (Part 2): multi layer self decrypting brute force, embedded ZIP+XOR license, stack string deobfuscation, prefix hash brute force, CVP/LLL lattice for integer validation, decision tree function obfuscation, GF(2^8) Gaussian elimination, ROP chain obfuscation analysis (ROPfuscation) [patterns ctf 3.md](patterns ctf 3.md) Competition specific patterns (Part 3): Z3 single line Python circuit, sliding window popcount, keyboard LED Morse code via ioctl, C++ destructor hidden validation, syscall side effect memory corruption, MFC dialog event handlers, VM sequential key chain brute force, Burrows Wheeler transform inversion, OpenType font ligature exploitation, GLSL shader VM with self modifying code, instruction counter as cryptographic state, batch crackme automation via objdump, fork+pipe+dead branch anti analysis, TensorFlow DNN inversion via sigmoid layer inversion, BPF filter analysis via kernel JIT to x64 assembly [languages.md](languages.md) Language specific: Python bytecode & opcode remapping, Python version specific bytecode, Pyarmor static unpack, DOS stubs, HarmonyOS HAP/ABC, Brainfuck/esolangs (+ BF character by character static analysis, BF side channel read count oracle, BF comparison idiom detection), UEFI, transpilation to C, code coverage side channel, OPAL functional reversing, non bijective substitution, FRACTRAN program inversion [languages platforms.md](languages platforms.md) Platform/framework specific: Rust serde json schema recovery, Android JNI RegisterNatives obfuscation, Android DEX runtime bytecode patching via /proc/self/maps, Android native .so loading bypass via new project, Frida Firebase Cloud Functions bypass, Verilog/hardware RE, prefix by prefix hash reversal, Ruby/Perl polyglot constraint satisfaction, Electron ASAR extraction + native binary analysis, Node.js npm runtime introspection [languages compiled.md](languages compiled.md) Go binary reversing (GoReSym, goroutines, memory layout, channel ops, embed.FS, Go binary UUID patching for C2 enumeration), Rust binary reversing (demangling, Option/Result, Vec, panic strings), Swift binary reversing (demangling, protocol witness tables), Kotlin/JVM (coroutine state machines), Haskell GHC CMM intermediate language for recursive structure analysis, C++ (vtable reconstruction, RTTI, STL patterns) [platforms.md](platforms.md) Platform specific RE: macOS/iOS (Mach O, code signing, Objective C runtime, Swift, dyld, jailbreak bypass), embedded/IoT firmware (binwalk, UART/JTAG/SPI extraction, ARM/MIPS, RTOS), kernel drivers (Linux .ko, eBPF, Windows .sys), automotive CAN bus [platforms hardware.md](platforms hardware.md) Hardware and advanced architecture RE: HD44780 LCD controller GPIO reconstruction, RISC V advanced (custom extensions, privileged modes, debugging), ARM64/AArch64 reversing and exploitation (calling convention, ROP gadgets, qemu aarch64 static emulation) [field notes.md](field notes.md) Quick reference notes: binary types, anti debugging bypass, specialized patterns, CTF case notes When to Pivot Heap / ROP / kernel exploit after the binary is understood → pwn chain/ Deleted files / PCAP / disk artifacts → digital forensics/ Web app with a small client helper → js reverse/ Real malware / C2 / packing → malware analysis/ Multi type CTF contest packaging → ctf sandbox/ (sidecar orchestrator) Problem Solving Workflow 1. Start with strings extraction many easy challenges have plaintext flags 2. Try ltrace/strace dynamic analysis often reveals flags without reversing 3. Try Frida hooking hook strcmp/memcmp to capture expected values without reversing 4. Try angr symbolic execution solves many flag checkers automatically 5. Try Qiling emulate foreign arch binaries or bypass heavy anti debug without artifacts 6. Map control flow before modifying execution 7. Automate manual processes via scripting (r2pipe, Frida, angr, Python) 8. Validate assumptions by comparing decompiler outputs (dogbolt.org for side by side) Quick Wins (Try First!) Initial Analysis Memory Dumping Strategy Key insight: Let the program compute the answer, then dump it. Break at final comparison ( b main+OFFSET ), enter any input of correct length, then x/s $rsi to dump computed flag. Decoy Flag Detection Pattern: Multiple fake targets before real check. Look for multiple comparison targets in sequence with different success messages. Set breakpoint at FINAL comparison, not earlier ones. GDB PIE Debugging PIE binaries randomize base address. Use relative breakpoints: Comparison Direction (Critical!) Two patterns: (1) transform(flag) == stored target — reverse the transform. (2) transform(stored target) == flag — flag IS the transformed data, just apply transform to stored target. Common Encryption Patterns XOR with single byte try all 256 values XOR with known plaintext ( flag{ , CTF{ ) RC4 with hardcoded key Custom permutation + XOR XOR with position index ( ^ i or ^ (i & 0xff) ) layered with a repeating key Quick Tool Reference Deep Dive Notes Use [field notes.md](field notes.md) after the first round of triage when you know what kind of target you have. Target formats: Python bytecode, WASM, Android, Flutter, .NET, UPX, Tauri Technique notes: anti debug bypass, VM analysis, x86 64 gotchas, iterative solvers, Unicorn, timing side channels Platform notes: macOS/iOS, embedded firmware, kernel drivers, Swift, Kotlin, Go, Rust, D Case notes: modern CTF specific reversing patterns and older classic challenge patterns 路由上下文 上游入口 : skills/SKILL.md (总控)、 routing.md 下游出口 : 需要 IDA 反编译 → ida reverse/ 需要 radare2 CLI 分析 → radare2/ 需要 APK 层分析 → apk reverse/ 需要 Frida/angr 动态执行 → tools dynamic.md 需要绕过反调试 → anti analysis.md 遇到特定语言(Go/Rust/Python/WASM)→ languages .md 遇到 CTF 模式 → patterns .md 同级关联模块 : apk reverse/ (APK 定位到 .so 时可切回本模块的 Frida/radare2 分支) 任务完成自检(声称完成前 MUST 通过) [ ] 我是否执行了工作流中的每一步(而不是只阅读)? [ ] 我是否基于 tool index 使用了真实工具路径? [ ] 我是否产出了可复现证据(命令/脚本/截图/报告)? [ ] 我是否完成并回写了 RULES 要求的 Checklist 项?