edit-spec
Edit a vigiles .spec.ts to change a compiled instruction file (CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md) — add, modify, or remove a rule, section, command, or key file. Use whenever you need to change a CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md that carries a vigiles hash (edit the spec, never the artifact), including adding a new enforce(
By zernie · 1,753 installs
npx skills add zernie/vigiles --skill edit-spec
Source repository · Upstream listing
Edit a .spec.ts file to update the project's instruction files. The spec is the source of truth — CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md are compiled build artifacts that must not be edited directly.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS — What the user wants to change. Examples:
"add a rule about always using the custom logger"
"update the architecture section"
"add src/services/auth.ts to key files"
"add npm run lint to commands"
"change the testing guidance"
Instructions
Step 1: Find the Spec
Look for spec files in the repo root:
CLAUDE.md.spec.ts — source for CLAUDE.md
AGENTS.md.spec.ts — source for AGENTS.md
Any .spec.ts matching instruction files
If no spec exists: if there's a hand written CLAUDE.md , suggest the
adopt spec skill; otherwise suggest npx vigiles init to scaffold one.
Step 2: Read and Understand the Spec
Read the spec file. It's a TypeScript file that exports a claude() call with these fields:
Step 3: Make the Changes
Based on what the user asked for:
Adding a rule (this absorbs the old generate rule skill):
Classify the rule from the request:
enforce() — a linter rule can back it. Check the project's linter configs
(ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, Pylint, RuboCop, Stylelint) for a matching rule; also
consider an architectural tool (ast grep, Dependency Cruiser, Steiger). If
uncertain whether a rule exists, ask the user rather than guessing.
check() — a filesystem structural convention ("every X needs a Y"). Only
for file pairing; never for code content.
guidance() — can't be mechanically enforced (subjective conventions,
process rules, migration context).
For enforce() : use the real linter rule name (e.g. eslint/no console ,
@typescript eslint/no explicit any , ruff/T201 ).
Add to the rules object with a kebab case key derived from the intent,
preserving alphabetical order if the existing rules are alphabetical. Import
any new builders needed (e.g. check and every for the first check() ).
Updating a section:
Edit the string in sections . Sections are plain strings or tagged template literals with file() , cmd() , ref() for verified references
Do NOT add or headers inside sections — they break the document structure
Adding a key file or command:
Add to keyFiles or commands . The compiler verifies these exist at compile time
For commands: must match a script in package.json
For key files: must exist on disk
Step 4: Compile
After editing the spec, run:
This regenerates the compiled instruction file(s). Review the output for any errors:
stale file — a key file path doesn't exist
stale command — a command isn't in package.json
invalid rule — a linter rule doesn't exist or is disabled
section has header — a section contains headers (break into separate named sections)
Step 5: Verify
If the vigiles plugin is installed ( /plugin marketplace add zernie/vigiles then /plugin install vigiles@vigiles , or npx vigiles init ), the PostToolUse hook recompiles automatically after you save the spec.
Important
Do what's asked; don't silently escalate enforcement. Add the rule the user asked for. If making it an enforce() would need a linter config edit or a plugin install (a cost), or if it could fail a clean CI, say so and let the user choose — don't change linter config or flip on strict / workflow gating on your own. A pure win (a rule that's already enabled) you can just apply. The strengthen skill owns guidance() → enforce() upgrades.
Never edit CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md directly — they have a vigiles hash comment and are build artifacts
The spec is TypeScript — you get type checking, autocomplete, and verified references
enforce() rules are verified — the compiler checks the rule exists AND is enabled in your linter config
Sections must not contain or headers — use separate named sections instead