architecture-decision-record
ADR templates in the Nygard format with context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording an architectural decision, or evaluating options.
By yonatangross · 1,331 installs
npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill architecture-decision-record
Source repository · Upstream listing
Architecture Decision Records
Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) are lightweight documents that capture important architectural decisions along with their context and consequences. This skill provides templates, examples, and best practices for creating and maintaining ADRs in your projects.
Overview
Making significant technology choices (databases, frameworks, cloud providers)
Designing system architecture or major components
Establishing patterns or conventions for the team
Evaluating trade offs between multiple approaches
Documenting decisions that will impact future development
Why ADRs Matter
ADRs serve as architectural memory for your team:
Context Preservation : Capture why decisions were made, not just what was decided
Onboarding : Help new team members understand architectural rationale
Prevent Revisiting : Avoid endless debates about settled decisions
Track Evolution : See how architecture evolved over time
Accountability : Clear ownership and decision timeline
ADR Format (Nygard Template)
Each ADR should follow this structure:
1. Title
Format: ADR : [Decision Title]
Example: ADR 0001: Adopt Microservices Architecture
2. Status
Current state of the decision:
Proposed : Under consideration
Accepted : Decision approved and being implemented
Superseded : Replaced by a later decision (reference ADR number)
Deprecated : No longer recommended but not yet replaced
Rejected : Considered but not adopted (document why)
3. Context
What to include:
Problem statement or opportunity
Business/technical constraints
Stakeholder requirements
Current state of the system
Forces at play (conflicting concerns)
4. Decision
What to include:
The choice being made
Key principles or patterns to follow
What will change as a result
Who is responsible for implementation
Be specific and actionable:
✅ "We will adopt microservices architecture using Node.js with Express"
❌ "We will consider using microservices"
5. Consequences
What to include:
Positive outcomes (benefits)
Negative outcomes (costs, risks, trade offs)
Neutral outcomes (things that change but aren't clearly better/worse)
6. Alternatives Considered
Document at least 2 alternatives:
For each alternative, explain:
What it was
Why it was considered
Why it was not chosen
7. References (Optional)
Links to relevant resources:
Meeting notes or discussion threads
Related ADRs
External research or articles
Proof of concept implementations
ADR Lifecycle
Best Practices
1. Keep ADRs Immutable
Once accepted, don't edit ADRs. Create new ADRs that supersede old ones.
✅ Create ADR 0015 that supersedes ADR 0003
❌ Update ADR 0003 with new decisions
2. Write in Present Tense
ADRs are historical records written as if the decision is being made now.
✅ "We will adopt microservices"
❌ "We adopted microservices"
3. Focus on 'Why', Not 'How'
ADRs capture decisions, not implementation details.
✅ "We chose PostgreSQL for relational consistency"
❌ "Configure PostgreSQL with these specific settings..."
4. Review ADRs as Team
Get input from relevant stakeholders before accepting.
Architects: Technical viability
Developers: Implementation feasibility
Product: Business alignment
DevOps: Operational concerns
5. Number Sequentially
Use 4 digit zero padded numbers: ADR 0001, ADR 0002, etc.
Maintain a single sequence even with multiple projects.
6. Store in Git
Keep ADRs in version control alongside code:
Location : /docs/adr/ or /architecture/decisions/
Format : Markdown for easy reading
Branch : Same branch as implementation
Quick Start Checklist
Option 1: Use Script Enhanced Generator (Recommended)
[ ] Run /create adr [number] [title] to generate ADR with auto filled context
[ ] ADR number, date, and author are auto populated
[ ] Review and fill in decision details
[ ] Set Status to "Proposed" and review with team
Option 2: Use Static Template
[ ] Copy ADR template from assets/adr template.md
[ ] Assign next sequential number (check existing ADRs)
[ ] Fill in Context: problem, constraints, requirements
[ ] Document Decision: what, why, how, who
[ ] List Consequences: positive, negative, neutral
[ ] Describe at least 2 Alternatives: what, pros/cons, why not chosen
[ ] Add References: discussions, research, related ADRs
[ ] Set Status to "Proposed"
[ ] Review with team
[ ] Update Status to "Accepted" after approval
[ ] Link ADR in implementation PR
[ ] Update Status to "Implemented" after deployment
Available Scripts
scripts/create adr.md Dynamic ADR generator with auto filled context
Auto fills: ADR number, date, author, total ADRs count
Usage: /create adr [number] [title]
Uses $ARGUMENTS and !command for dynamic context
assets/adr template.md Static template for manual use
Rules Quick Reference
Rule Impact What It Covers
[interrogation scalability](rules/interrogation scalability.md) HIGH Scale questions, data volume, growth projections
[interrogation reliability](rules/interrogation reliability.md) HIGH Data patterns, UX impact, coherence validation
[interrogation security](rules/interrogation security.md) HIGH Access control, tenant isolation, attack surface
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
❌ Too Technical : "We'll use Kubernetes with these 50 YAML configs..."
✅ Right Level : "We'll use Kubernetes for container orchestration because..."
❌ Too Vague : "We'll use a better database"
✅ Specific : "We'll use PostgreSQL 15+ for transactional data because..."
❌ No Alternatives : Only documenting the chosen solution
✅ Comparative : Document why alternatives weren't chosen
❌ Missing Consequences : Only listing benefits
✅ Balanced : Honest about costs and trade offs
❌ No Context : "We decided to use Redis"
✅ Contextual : "Given our 1M+ concurrent users and sub 50ms latency requirement..."
Related Skills
ork:api design : Use when designing APIs referenced in ADRs
ork:database patterns : Use when ADR involves database choices
security checklist : Consult when ADR has security implications
Skill Version : 2.0.0
Last Updated : 2026 01 08
Maintained by : OrchestKit
Capability Details
adr creation
Keywords: adr, architecture decision, decision record, document decision
Solves:
How do I document an architectural decision?
Create an ADR
Architecture decision template
adr best practices
Keywords: when to write adr, adr lifecycle, adr workflow, adr process, adr review, quantify impact
Solves:
When should I write an ADR?
How do I manage ADR lifecycle?
What's the ADR review process?
How to quantify decision impact?
ADR anti patterns to avoid
Link related ADRs
tradeoff analysis
Keywords: tradeoff, pros cons, alternatives, comparison, evaluate options
Solves:
How do I analyze tradeoffs?
Compare architectural options
Document alternatives considered
consequences
Keywords: consequence, impact, risk, benefit, outcome
Solves:
What are the consequences of this decision?
Document decision impact
Risk and benefit analysis