team-composition-patterns

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics, preset configurations, and agent type selection. Use this skill when deciding how many agents to spawn for a task, when choosing between a review team versus a feature team versus a debug team, when selecting the correct subagent_type fo

By wshobson · 8,468 installs

npx skills add wshobson/agents --skill team-composition-patterns

Source repository · Upstream listing

Team Composition Patterns Best practices for composing multi agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature. When to Use This Skill Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task Choosing between preset team configurations Selecting the right agent type (subagent type) for each role Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in process) Building custom team compositions for non standard workflows Team Sizing Heuristics Complexity Team Size When to Use Simple 1 2 Single dimension review, isolated bug, small feature Moderate 2 3 Multi file changes, 2 3 concerns, medium features Complex 3 4 Cross cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging Very Complex 4 5 Full stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues Rule of thumb : Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead. Preset Team Compositions Review Team Size : 3 reviewers Agents : 3x team reviewer Default dimensions : security, performance, architecture Use when : Code changes need multi dimensional quality assessment Debug Team Size : 3 investigators Agents : 3x team debugger Default hypotheses : 3 competing hypotheses Use when : Bug has multiple plausible root causes Feature Team Size : 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers) Agents : 1x team lead + 2x team implementer Use when : Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams Fullstack Team Size : 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers) Agents : 1x team lead + 1x frontend team implementer + 1x backend team implementer + 1x test team implementer Use when : Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers Research Team Size : 3 researchers Agents : 3x general purpose Default areas : Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic Capabilities : Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) Use when : Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel Security Team Size : 4 reviewers Agents : 4x team reviewer Default dimensions : OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration Use when : Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces Migration Team Size : 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer) Agents : 1x team lead + 2x team implementer + 1x team reviewer Use when : Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification Agent Type Selection When spawning teammates with the Agent tool, choose subagent type based on what tools the teammate needs: Agent Type Tools Available Use For general purpose All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes Explore Read only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) Research, code exploration, analysis Plan Read only tools Architecture planning, task decomposition agent teams:team reviewer Read/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage Code review with structured findings agent teams:team debugger Read/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage Hypothesis driven investigation agent teams:team implementer Read/Write/Edit/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage Building features within file ownership boundaries agent teams:team lead Read/search/Bash plus Agent Teams coordination tools Team orchestration and coordination Key distinction : Read only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read only agents. Display Mode Configuration Configure in ~/.claude/settings.json : Mode Behavior Best For "tmux" Each teammate in a tmux pane Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents "iterm2" Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab macOS users who prefer iTerm2 "in process" All teammates in same process Simple tasks, CI/CD environments Custom Team Guidelines When building custom teams: 1. Every team needs a coordinator — Either designate a team lead or have the user coordinate directly 2. Match roles to agent types — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available 3. Avoid duplicate roles — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources 4. Define boundaries upfront — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities 5. Keep it small — 2 4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead Troubleshooting A teammate was spawned as Explore but needs to write files. Explore and Plan are read only agents. Change the subagent type to general purpose or an appropriate specialized agent type. Never assign implementation tasks to read only agents. The team is growing too large and coordination is slowing everything down. Each additional teammate adds communication overhead. Consolidate roles: can one agent cover two dimensions? A 4 person team doing 6 independent tasks is usually better served by 3 agents covering 2 tasks each. tmux mode is not showing panes. Ensure tmux is installed and a session is already running before spawning teammates. The in process mode works without tmux and is suitable for CI or scripted environments. Two reviewers are flagging the same issues. The review dimensions overlap. Redefine each reviewer's focus area: one on correctness/logic, one on security, one on performance/scalability. Overlapping coverage wastes tokens and produces duplicate findings. A team lead is spawning teammates but they are not receiving tasks. Verify that the lead is using the Agent tool to spawn teammates and passing complete context in the prompt. Teammates start fresh with no prior conversation history — they need all relevant information in their initial prompt. Related Skills [parallel feature development](../parallel feature development/SKILL.md) — Decompose work streams and assign file ownership once the team is composed [team communication protocols](../team communication protocols/SKILL.md) — Establish messaging norms and shutdown procedures for the assembled team