Analyze recent post-earnings stocks using a 5-factor scoring system (Gap Size, Pre-Earnings Trend, Volume Trend, MA200 Position, MA50 Position). Scores each stock 0-100 and assigns A/B/C/D grades. Use when user asks about earnings trade analysis, post-earnings momentum screening, earnings gap scorin

Earnings Trade Analyzer Post Earnings 5 Factor Scoring Analyze recent post earnings stocks using a 5 factor weighted scoring system to identify the strongest earnings reactions for potential momentum trades. When to Use User asks for post earnings trade analysis or earnings gap screening User wants to find the best recent earnings reactions User requests earnings momentum scoring or grading User asks about post earnings accumulation day (PEAD) candidates Prerequisites FMP API key (set FMP API KEY environment variable or pass api key ) Free tier (250 calls/day) is sufficient for default screening (lookback 2 days, top 20) Paid tier recommended for larger lookback windows or full screening Workflow Step 1: Run the Earnings Trade Analyzer Execute the analyzer script: Degraded endpoint / budget fallback for scheduled reviews If the analyzer reports a 404, an implausible empty earnings calendar, or exhausts its API call budget before producing scored candidates during a scheduled after close/pre market run, do not report "no earnings reactions" immediately. Budget or daily rate limit exhaustion during profile fetching exits 1 with ZERO RESULT REASON=profiles budget exhausted rather than exiting successfully — treat it as a failed run to retry or fall back on, not a quiet day. 1. First retry once with a narrower liquid universe configuration so the full 5 factor scorer has a chance to complete, for example: 2. If the scored run still returns no candidates or cannot complete, verify the same range through the stable endpoint used by the compatibility shim and clearly label the result as an ungraded fallback: Then optionally enrich returned US tickers through the analyzer's stable first FMP client or per symbol /stable/quote?symbol=<ticker calls to rank by same day changesPercentage , market cap, and liquidity. Use legacy /api/v3 quote calls only as a legacy key fallback after stable has failed. Present these as preliminary / ungraded reactions because the 5 factor scorer did not run; do not assign A/B/C/D grades from the fallback alone. No candidate output pitfall: The analyzer may print Candidates after filtering: 0 / No candidates found matching criteria. and exit successfully without writing an earnings trade analyzer .json file. In that case, do not try to run PEAD Mode B from a nonexistent candidate file. Say explicitly that no scored analyzer JSON was produced, run the endpoint/quote enrichment fallback above if the routine needs an earnings section, and label any names as manual review only. This success exit path does not cover budget exhaustion during profile fetching: that case exits 1 ( ZERO RESULT REASON=profiles budget exhausted ) instead. Step 2: Review Results 1. Read the generated JSON and Markdown reports 2. Load references/scoring methodology.md for scoring interpretation context 3. Focus on Grade A and B stocks for actionable setups Step 3: Present Analysis For each top candidate, present: Composite score and letter grade (A/B/C/D) Earnings gap size and direction Pre earnings 20 day trend Volume ratio (20 day vs 60 day average) Position relative to 200 day and 50 day moving averages Weakest and strongest scoring components Step 4: Provide Actionable Guidance Based on grades: Grade A (85+): Strong earnings reaction with institutional accumulation consider entry Grade B (70 84): Good earnings reaction worth monitoring wait for pullback or confirmation Grade C (55 69): Mixed signals use caution, additional analysis needed Grade D (<55): Weak setup avoid or wait for better conditions Output earnings trade analyzer YYYY MM DD HHMMSS.json Structured results with schema version "1.0" earnings trade analyzer YYYY MM DD HHMMSS.md Human readable report with tables Unknown earnings timing FMP does not confirm a bmo/amc session for every earnings row; unconfirmed rows report earnings timing: "unknown" and the gap calculation assumes the AMC window as a fallback. Both reports surface timing unknown count out of timing candidates total so this assumption stays visible rather than blending unnoticed into the scores. Resources references/scoring methodology.md 5 factor scoring system, grade thresholds, and entry quality filter rules

earnings-trade-analyzer