competitor-teardown
Structured competitive analysis with feature matrices, SWOT, positioning maps, and UX review. Covers research frameworks, pricing comparison, review mining, and visual deliverables. Use for: market research, competitive intelligence, investor decks, product strategy, sales enablement. Triggers: comp
By skills-shell · 1,237 installs
npx skills add skills-shell/superpowers --skill competitor-teardown
Source repository · Upstream listing
Install the belt CLI skill: npx skills add belt sh/cli
Competitor Teardown
Structured competitive analysis with research and screenshots via [inference.sh](https://inference.sh) CLI.
Quick Start
Requires inference.sh CLI ( belt ). [Install instructions](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inference sh/skills/refs/heads/main/cli install.md)
Teardown Framework
The 7 Layer Analysis
Layer What to Analyze Data Source
1. Product Features, UX, quality Screenshots, free trial
2. Pricing Plans, pricing model, hidden costs Pricing page, sales call
3. Positioning Messaging, tagline, ICP Website, ads
4. Traction Users, revenue, growth Web search, press, funding
5. Reviews Strengths, weaknesses from users G2, Capterra, App Store
6. Content Blog, social, SEO strategy Website, social profiles
7. Team Size, key hires, background LinkedIn, About page
Research Commands
Company Overview
Product Analysis
UX Screenshots
Feature Matrix
Structure
Rules
✅ = Full support
⚠️ or "Partial" = Limited or conditional
❌ = Not available
Note conditions: "Paid only", "Enterprise tier", "Beta"
Lead with features where YOU win
Be honest about competitor strengths — credibility matters
Pricing Comparison
Structure
What to Look For
Minimum seat requirements
Annual only billing (reduces flexibility)
Feature gating between tiers
Overage charges
Setup/onboarding fees
Contract lock in periods
SWOT Analysis
Create a SWOT for each competitor:
Positioning Map
A 2x2 matrix showing where competitors sit on two meaningful dimensions.
Choose Meaningful Axes
Good Axes Bad Axes
Simple ↔ Complex Good ↔ Bad
SMB ↔ Enterprise Cheap ↔ Expensive (too obvious)
Self serve ↔ Sales led Old ↔ New
Specialized ↔ General Small ↔ Large
Opinionated ↔ Flexible —
Template
Generating the Visual
Review Mining
Where to Find Reviews
Platform Best For URL Pattern
G2 B2B SaaS g2.com/products/[product]/reviews
Capterra Business software capterra.com/software/[id]/reviews
App Store iOS apps apps.apple.com
Google Play Android apps play.google.com
Product Hunt Launches producthunt.com/posts/[product]
Reddit Honest opinions reddit.com/r/[relevant sub]
What to Extract
Category Look For
Most praised What features do happy users mention most?
Most complained What do unhappy users say? (= your opportunity)
Switching reasons Why do users leave? What triggers switching?
Feature requests What's missing that users want?
Comparison mentions When users compare, what do they say?
Deliverable Formats
Executive Summary (1 page)
Detailed Report (per competitor)
1. Company overview (size, funding, team)
2. Product analysis (features, UX screenshots)
3. Pricing breakdown
4. SWOT analysis
5. Review analysis (top praised, top complained)
6. Positioning vs. you
7. Opportunity summary
Comparison Grid Visual
Common Mistakes
Mistake Problem Fix
Only looking at features Misses positioning, pricing, traction Use the 7 layer framework
Biased analysis Loses credibility Be honest about competitor strengths
Outdated data Wrong conclusions Date all research, refresh quarterly
Too many competitors Analysis paralysis Focus on top 3 5 direct competitors
No "so what" Data without insight End each section with implications for you
Feature only comparison Doesn't show positioning Include pricing, reviews, positioning map
Related Skills
Browse all apps: belt app list