executing-plans
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
By sickn33 · 606 installs
npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill executing-plans
Source repository · Upstream listing
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute tasks in batches, report for review between batches.
Core principle: Batch execution with checkpoints for architect review.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing plans skill to implement this plan."
The Process
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
1. Read plan file
2. Review critically identify any questions or concerns about the plan
3. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
4. If no concerns: use the project’s existing task/todo mechanism and proceed; TodoWrite is a host specific tool, not a universally installed command
Step 2: Execute Batch
Batch size follows the user’s explicit instruction or project contract; otherwise choose a practical reviewable group
For each task:
1. Mark as in progress
2. Follow each step exactly (plan has bite sized steps)
3. Run verifications as specified
4. Mark as completed
Step 3: Report
When batch complete:
Show what was implemented
Show verification output
Continue to the next authorized batch unless the user explicitly requested a checkpoint; provide concise progress without ending the task unnecessarily.
Step 4: Continue
Based on feedback:
Apply changes if needed
Execute next batch
Repeat until complete
Step 5: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
Announce: "I'm using the finishing a development branch skill to complete this work."
Use the actually available finishing a development branch skill only when appropriate; repository specific maintainer/merge workflows take precedence. Do not invent a superpowers plugin dependency.
Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
When to Stop and Ask for Help
Pause only the dependent step when an indispensable input/authorization or unresolved external blocker prevents it; preserve independent work. Repair ordinary failures autonomously. Examples of issues to investigate include:
A missing dependency or failing test: inspect the actual cause and attempt relevant repair; it is not automatically a reason to stop
Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
You don't understand an instruction
Verification fails repeatedly
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers stop and ask.
Remember
Review plan critically first
Follow plan steps exactly
Don't skip verifications
Reference skills when plan says to
Between batches: follow the user’s authorized cadence and continue when no required checkpoint remains
Stop when blocked, don't guess
When to Use
Use when implementing an existing written plan with verifiable tasks and checkpoints. Preserve the plan file when requested, use existing todos and the user’s latest batching/continuation instruction.
Example
User request:
Use @executing plans for this task: Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints.
Limitations
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.