anti-slop

Comprehensive toolkit for detecting and eliminating "AI slop" - generic, low-quality AI-generated patterns in natural language, code, and design. Use when reviewing or improving content quality, preventing generic AI patterns, cleaning up existing content, or enforcing quality standards in writing,

By rand · 631 installs

npx skills add rand/cc-polymath --skill anti-slop

Source repository · Upstream listing

Anti Slop Skill Detect and eliminate generic AI generated patterns ("slop") across natural language, code, and design. What is AI Slop? AI slop refers to telltale patterns that signal low quality, generic AI generated content: Text : Overused phrases like "delve into," excessive buzzwords, meta commentary Code : Generic variable names, obvious comments, unnecessary abstraction Design : Cookie cutter layouts, generic gradients, overused visual patterns This skill helps identify and remove these patterns to create authentic, high quality content. When to Use This Skill Apply anti slop techniques when: Reviewing AI generated content before delivery Creating original content and want to avoid generic patterns Cleaning up existing content that feels generic Establishing quality standards for a project User explicitly requests slop detection or cleanup Content has telltale signs of generic AI generation Core Workflow 1. Detect Slop For text files: This analyzes text and provides: Slop score (0 100, higher is worse) Specific pattern findings Actionable recommendations Manual detection: Read the appropriate reference file for detailed patterns: references/text patterns.md Natural language slop patterns references/code patterns.md Programming slop patterns references/design patterns.md Visual/UX design slop patterns 2. Clean Slop Automated cleanup (text only): Manual cleanup: Apply strategies from the reference files based on detected patterns. Text Slop Detection & Cleanup High Priority Targets Remove immediately: "delve into" → delete or replace with "examine" "navigate the complexities" → "handle" or delete "in today's fast paced world" → delete "it's important to note that" → delete Meta commentary about the document itself Simplify wordy phrases: "in order to" → "to" "due to the fact that" → "because" "has the ability to" → "can" Replace buzzwords: "leverage" → "use" "synergistic" → "cooperative" "paradigm shift" → "major change" Quality Principles Be direct: Skip preambles and meta commentary Lead with the actual point Cut transition words that don't add meaning Be specific: Replace generic terms with concrete examples Name specific things instead of "items," "things," "data" Use precise verbs instead of vague action words Be authentic: Vary sentence structure and length Use active voice predominantly Write in a voice appropriate to context, not corporate generic Code Slop Detection & Cleanup High Priority Targets Rename generic variables: data → name what data it represents result → name what the result contains temp → name what you're temporarily storing item → name what kind of item Remove obvious comments: Simplify over engineered code: Remove unnecessary abstraction layers Replace design patterns used without purpose Simplify complex implementations of simple tasks Improve function names: handleData() → what are you doing with data? processItems() → what processing specifically? manageUsers() → what management action? Quality Principles Clarity over cleverness: Write code that's easy to understand Optimize only when profiling shows need Prefer simple solutions to complex ones Meaningful names: Variable names should describe content Function names should describe action + object Class names should describe responsibility Appropriate documentation: Document why, not what Skip documentation for self evident code Focus documentation on public APIs and complex logic Design Slop Detection & Cleanup High Priority Targets Visual slop: Generic gradient backgrounds (purple/pink/cyan) Overuse of glassmorphism or neumorphism Floating 3D shapes without purpose Every element using same design treatment Layout slop: Template driven layouts ignoring content needs Everything in cards regardless of content type Excessive whitespace without hierarchy Center alignment of all elements Copy slop: "Empower your business" type headlines Generic CTAs like "Get Started" without context Buzzword heavy descriptions Stock photo aesthetics Quality Principles Content first design: Design around actual content needs Create hierarchy based on importance Let content determine layout, not templates Intentional choices: Every design decision should be justifiable Use patterns because they serve users, not because they're trendy Vary visual treatment based on element importance Authentic voice: Copy should reflect brand personality Avoid generic marketing speak Be specific about value proposition Reference Files Consult these comprehensive guides when working on specific domains: [text patterns.md](references/text patterns.md) Complete catalog of natural language slop patterns with detection rules and cleanup strategies [code patterns.md](references/code patterns.md) Programming antipatterns across languages with refactoring guidance [design patterns.md](references/design patterns.md) Visual and UX design slop patterns with improvement strategies Each reference includes: Pattern definitions and examples Detection signals (high/medium confidence) Context where patterns are acceptable Specific cleanup strategies Scripts detect slop.py Analyzes text files for AI slop patterns. Usage: Output: Overall slop score (0 100) Category specific findings Line numbers and examples Actionable recommendations Scoring: 0 20: Low slop (authentic writing) 20 40: Moderate slop (some patterns) 40 60: High slop (many patterns) 60+: Severe slop (heavily generic) clean slop.py Automatically removes common slop patterns from text files. Usage: What it cleans: High risk phrases Wordy constructions Meta commentary Excessive hedging Buzzwords Redundant qualifiers Empty intensifiers Safety: Always creates .backup file when overwriting Preview mode shows changes before applying Preserves content meaning (non aggressive mode) Best Practices Prevention Over Cure When creating content: 1. Write with specific audience in mind 2. Use concrete examples over abstractions 3. Lead with the point, skip preambles 4. Choose words for precision, not impression 5. Review before considering it complete Context Aware Cleanup Not all patterns are always slop: Acceptable contexts: Academic writing may need more hedging Legal documents require specific phrasing Internal documentation can use shortcuts Technical docs have domain specific conventions Always consider: Who is the audience? What is the purpose? Does this pattern serve a function? Is there a better alternative? Iterative Improvement 1. Detect Run detection scripts or manual review 2. Analyze Understand which patterns are truly problems 3. Clean Apply automated cleanup where safe 4. Review Manually verify changes maintain meaning 5. Refine Fix remaining issues by hand Quality Over Automation The scripts are tools, not replacements for judgment: Use automated detection to find candidates Apply automated cleanup to obvious patterns Manually review anything that changes meaning Exercise discretion based on context Integration Patterns Code Review Content Pipeline 1. Create initial content 2. Run slop detection 3. Apply automated cleanup 4. Manual review and refinement 5. Final quality check Standards Enforcement Create project specific thresholds: Max acceptable slop score: 30 Required manual review for scores 20 Auto reject submissions with scores 50 Limitations Scripts only handle text: Code slop detection is manual (use code patterns.md) Design slop detection is manual (use design patterns.md) Context sensitivity: Scripts can't understand all contexts Some "slop" may be appropriate in certain domains Always review automated changes Language coverage: Detection patterns optimized for English Code patterns focus on common languages (Python, JS, Java) Design patterns are platform agnostic Common Scenarios Scenario 1: Review AI Generated Content Scenario 2: Clean Up Codebase Scenario 3: Design Review Scenario 4: Establish Quality Standards Tips for Success For text cleanup: Run detection first to understand scope Use non aggressive mode for important content Always review automated changes Focus on high risk patterns first For code cleanup: Start with renaming generic variables Remove obvious comments next Refactor over engineered code last Test after each significant change For design cleanup: Audit visual elements against patterns Prioritize structural issues over aesthetic ones Ensure changes serve user needs Maintain brand consistency General principles: Quality uniformity Context rules Clarity cleverness Specificity generality