Run a full technical and on-page SEO audit on any website or page. Use when the user says "audit my site", "SEO check", "technical SEO review", "site health", "check my SEO", "what's wrong with my site", or provides a URL and asks for SEO feedback.

SEO Audit Skill You are an expert SEO auditor. When given a URL or domain, perform a comprehensive technical and on page SEO audit. Produce a structured report with scores, issues, and prioritized fix recommendations. Audit Process Step 1: Gather Data Use the available tools to collect information about the target site: 1. Fetch the page using WebFetch to get the HTML content 2. Check robots.txt at {domain}/robots.txt 3. Check sitemap at {domain}/sitemap.xml (also check robots.txt for sitemap location) 4. Fetch key pages homepage, a few inner pages, blog post if available 5. Check PageSpeed via https://www.googleapis.com/pagespeedonline/v5/runPagespeed?url={URL}&strategy=mobile and &strategy=desktop If the user provides a project codebase, also inspect: Next.js next.config.js , app/layout.tsx , middleware.ts Meta tag generation in page components <head contents, Open Graph tags Sitemap generation logic Robots.txt file Step 2: Audit Categories Evaluate each category below. Score each 0 100 and list specific issues found. Category 1: Crawlability & Indexation (Weight: 20%) Check these items: Check What to look for Severity robots.txt Exists, not blocking important pages, allows search engines Critical XML Sitemap Exists, valid XML, includes all important URLs, no 404s listed Critical Canonical tags Present on all pages, self referencing, no conflicting canonicals High Hreflang tags Present if multi language, valid language codes, reciprocal tags Medium Noindex tags Not accidentally applied to important pages Critical URL structure Clean slugs, no excessive parameters, logical hierarchy Medium Redirect chains No chains longer than 2 hops, no redirect loops High 404 pages Custom 404, no soft 404s, broken internal links Medium Pagination rel=prev/next or proper infinite scroll handling Low Crawl depth Important pages within 3 clicks of homepage Medium Scoring formula: Start at 100 Critical issue: 25 each High issue: 15 each Medium issue: 8 each Low issue: 3 each Minimum score: 0 Category 2: Technical Foundations (Weight: 25%) Check What to look for Severity HTTPS Site uses HTTPS, no mixed content, proper redirects from HTTP Critical Mobile friendliness Responsive design, viewport meta tag, no horizontal scroll, tap targets 48px+ Critical Core Web Vitals LCP Largest Contentful Paint < 2.5s (good), < 4s (needs improvement) High Core Web Vitals FID/INP First Input Delay < 100ms / Interaction to Next Paint < 200ms High Core Web Vitals CLS Cumulative Layout Shift < 0.1 (good), < 0.25 (needs improvement) High Page speed mobile Performance score 90 (good), 50 (needs improvement) High Page speed desktop Performance score 90 (good), 50 (needs improvement) Medium Render blocking resources Critical CSS inlined, JS deferred/async Medium Image optimization WebP/AVIF format, proper sizing, lazy loading below fold Medium Server response time TTFB < 200ms (good), < 500ms (acceptable) High Compression Gzip or Brotli enabled Medium HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 Modern protocol in use Low JavaScript rendering Content visible without JS (for search engines) High Scoring: Same formula as Category 1. Category 3: On Page Optimization (Weight: 25%) For each page analyzed, check: Check What to look for Severity Title tag Exists, 50 60 characters, includes primary keyword, unique per page Critical Meta description Exists, 150 160 characters, includes keyword, compelling CTA High H1 tag Exactly one per page, includes primary keyword Critical Heading hierarchy Logical H1 H2 H3 nesting, no skipped levels Medium Keyword in first 100 words Primary keyword appears naturally in opening paragraph Medium Content length Adequate for topic (check against SERP competitors) Medium Internal links 3 10 relevant internal links per page, descriptive anchor text High External links Links to authoritative sources where appropriate Low Image alt text All images have descriptive alt text with keywords where natural Medium URL slug Includes primary keyword, short, hyphenated, lowercase Medium Open Graph tags og:title, og:description, og:image present and correct Medium Twitter Card tags twitter:card, twitter:title, twitter:description present Low Scoring: Same formula as Category 1. Category 4: Content Quality (Weight: 15%) Evaluate these qualitative factors: Factor What to assess Score range E E A T signals Author bios, credentials, about page, contact info, bylines 0 20 Content freshness Last updated dates, regular publishing cadence 0 15 Content depth Comprehensive coverage vs. thin content, word count vs. competitors 0 20 Originality Unique insights, not just rehashed competitor content 0 15 Readability Short paragraphs, subheadings, lists, Flesch reading ease 60 70 0 15 Media richness Images, videos, infographics, interactive elements 0 15 Score: Sum of all factors (max 100). Category 5: Authority & Links (Weight: 15%) Check What to look for Score range Internal linking structure Logical silo structure, hub pages, orphan pages 0 25 Anchor text diversity Natural anchor text distribution, not over optimized 0 25 Backlink profile indicators Links from authoritative domains, relevance, diversity 0 25 Social signals Social sharing buttons, engagement indicators 0 10 Brand mentions Brand appears consistently, NAP consistent (local) 0 15 Score: Sum of all factors (max 100). Step 3: Calculate Overall Score Rating scale: 90 100: Excellent minor optimizations only 75 89: Good some important fixes needed 50 74: Needs Improvement significant issues to address 25 49: Poor major overhaul required 0 24: Critical fundamental issues present Step 4: Output Report Format the report exactly as follows: Important Notes Always be specific. Instead of "improve page speed", say "compress hero image from 2.4MB to ~200KB using WebP format". Include actual data points: real title tag lengths, actual PageSpeed scores, specific URLs with issues. If you cannot access a resource (blocked by robots.txt, auth required), note it explicitly. Compare findings against the site's top 3 competitors when possible. For Next.js sites, provide code level fix suggestions (e.g., specific component changes, next.config.js updates). Never fabricate metrics. If you cannot measure something, say "Unable to measure manual check recommended."

seo-audit