oblique-worldbuilding

Create worldbuilding quotes and epigraphs through documentary perspectives. Use for chapter epigraphs, in-world documents, or any content where limited perspective creates meaning through what the documenter cannot see.

By jwynia · 431 installs

npx skills add jwynia/agent-skills --skill oblique-worldbuilding

Source repository · Upstream listing

Oblique Worldbuilding: Documentary Perspective Skill You help writers create worldbuilding quotes and epigraphs that enhance chapters through perspective driven documentation rather than direct commentary. The power lies in the documenter's limited vantage point, motivated reasoning, and systematic blindness. Core Principle Every documentary voice reveals the world through what it cannot afford to see. The goal isn't temporal distance from events, but perspectival limitation. A quote from the same week as chapter events, written by someone with professional blinders, creates more meaning than a neutral description from centuries later. The Perspective Engine Essential Components of a Documentary Perspective Every documentary voice needs four elements: 1. Position : Where they sit relative to power, knowledge, and events 2. Need : What they must believe to maintain their position/sanity/identity 3. Lens : The framework through which they interpret reality 4. Blindness : What they cannot afford to see or acknowledge Types of Perspectival Limitation Professional Deformation : Engineers see only engineering problems Lawyers see only legal issues Priests see only moral failings Merchants see only market opportunities Bureaucrats see only process compliance Scientists see only measurable phenomena Positional Necessity : Middle managers must believe the system works Revolutionaries must believe change is possible Survivors must believe their survival had meaning Perpetrators must believe in their justifications Historians must believe the past is knowable Prophets must believe the future is shapeable Cultural Assumption : What "everyone knows" that isn't true Values too fundamental to question Categories that seem natural but aren't Assumptions about human nature Beliefs about how change happens Creating Oblique Relevance The Distance Hierarchy First Order Distance : Same events, different perspective Risk: Too direct Use sparingly for ironic effect Second Order Distance : Related phenomena, different context Sweet spot for oblique relevance Shows systemic patterns Requires reader inference Third Order Distance : Thematic or systemic echoes only Risk: Too obscure Use for subtle resonance Connection Types Systemic Echo : Shows the same forces operating elsewhere: Different scale, same dynamics Parallel structures in different domains Same problem, different manifestation Ironic Juxtaposition : Creates meaning through contrast: Mundane concerns during crisis Historical confidence before catastrophe Bureaucratic language for human tragedy Technical precision describing chaos Thematic Rhyme : Different situation, same human pattern: Power dynamics across contexts Human costs in different systems Universal behaviors in specific settings Causal Chain : Distant causes or effects: Butterfly effect implications Unintended consequences Historical roots of current problems Future echoes of present choices Document Types and Their Perspectives Administrative/Bureaucratic Perspective : Process and compliance Blindness : Human cost, systemic failure Examples : Memos, regulations, form letters, compliance reports Best for : Revealing institutional callousness Academic/Scientific Perspective : Measurable phenomena, theoretical frameworks Blindness : Lived experience, unmeasurable truth Examples : Journal abstracts, grant proposals, peer reviews Best for : Showing expert misunderstanding Commercial/Economic Perspective : Profit, efficiency, market dynamics Blindness : Externalities, human value Examples : Ad copy, quarterly reports, market analysis Best for : Revealing commodification Personal/Intimate Perspective : Individual experience, emotional truth Blindness : Systemic forces, larger patterns Examples : Diaries, letters, personal notes Best for : Humanizing large scale events Cultural/Artistic Perspective : Aesthetic value, cultural meaning Blindness : Political reality, material conditions Examples : Reviews, artist statements, program notes Best for : Showing cultural denial Legal/Regulatory Perspective : Rules, precedent, liability Blindness : Justice, human complexity Examples : Contracts, case notes, legal opinions Best for : Revealing system limitations Religious/Philosophical Perspective : Meaning, morality, eternal truth Blindness : Material reality, changing context Examples : Sermons, theological treatises, moral guides Best for : Showing ideological frameworks Advanced Techniques The Revealing Detail Include small details that only this perspective would notice or care about, revealing their priorities and blindness. The Telling Omission What obvious element (obvious to readers) does the documenter completely fail to mention? The Accidental Truth What does the documenter reveal without meaning to, through their framing or focus? The Competing Authorities Use contradictory documents about the same phenomena to reveal factional perspectives. The Unreliable Compiler Create a fictional editor whose bias shapes the selection and framing of documents. The Layered Meaning Craft quotes that work on multiple levels: Surface: Interesting worldbuilding detail Contextual: Comments on chapter events Ironic: Reveals documenter's limitations Thematic: Illuminates larger concerns Implementation Process Step 1: Analyze the Chapter What system or force is at work? What human cost is shown? What assumptions are challenged? What power dynamics are revealed? Step 2: Choose Your Perspective Who would document this type of thing? What would they need to believe? What couldn't they afford to see? How would they frame it? Step 3: Select Document Type Match formality to the perspective Consider whose voice adds most value Balance variety across the work Step 4: Calibrate Connection Strength Aim for "Ah!" not "Obviously" Ensure the quote works standalone Test for revelation when connected Step 5: Layer Additional Meaning Plant seeds for future revelations Add worldbuilding texture Create re read value Worked Example Chapter Event : Character discovers their employer has been suppressing union organizing through surveillance tech Analysis : System at work: Technology enabling labor suppression Human cost: Loss of worker agency Assumption challenged: Tech as neutral tool Perspective Choice : Middle management, 15 years later Position: Implemented the system Need: Believe they helped everyone Lens: Efficiency metrics Blindness: Worker autonomy Document Type : Corporate newsletter employee spotlight Quote : "Employee Spotlight: Jarvis Chen, Facilities Optimization 'What I love about the SmartFlow system is how it takes the guesswork out of scheduling. Before, we had to negotiate every shift change, deal with availability conflicts... now the algorithm handles it all. Staff productivity is up 23% and no more of those awkward conversations! The team seems happier too they don't have to stress about asking for time off. The system just knows when they're needed most.'" Why it works : Shows how surveillance gets normalized Reveals management's self deception Uses efficiency language to hide control Creates irony through enthusiasm Quality Checks The Perspective Test Is the documenter's position clear? Are their limitations believable? Does their blindness create irony? The Relevance Test Does the quote resonate with chapter themes? Is the connection discoverable but not obvious? Does it expand understanding? The Standalone Test Is the quote interesting without the chapter? Does it build the world independently? Could it seed its own story? Output Persistence Output Discovery 1. Check for context/output config.md in the project 2. If found, look for this skill's entry 3. If not found, ask user: "Where should I save epigraph documents?" 4. Suggest: worldbuilding/documents/ or explorations/worldbuilding/ Primary Output Documentary voice Position, need, lens, blindness Document type Administrative, academic, commercial, etc. Connection type Systemic echo, ironic juxtaposition, thematic rhyme Layered meanings Surface, contextual, ironic, thematic File Naming Pattern: {chapter/section} epigraph {date}.md Verification (Oracle) What This Skill Can Verify Perspective components Position/need/lens/blindness defined? (High confidence) Connection presence Relevance to chapter identifiable? (Medium confidence) Standalone quality Quote interesting without chapter? (Medium confidence) What Requires Human Judgment Subtlety calibration Too direct or too obscure? Voice authenticity Does it sound like the documenter? Reader discovery Will connection create "ah!" moment? Oracle Limitations Cannot assess whether reader will make the intended connection Cannot predict whether irony will land Feedback Loop Session Persistence Output location: See context/output config.md What to save: Voice definition, document, connection analysis Naming pattern: {chapter/section} epigraph {date}.md Cross Session Learning Check for prior epigraphs in this work Ensure variety of document types and perspectives Failed connections inform anti patterns Design Constraints This Skill Assumes Story has chapters/sections that can receive epigraphs World has documentary voices beyond the narrative Writer wants implied depth, not exposition This Skill Does Not Handle Direct worldbuilding Route to: worldbuilding Cultural texture Route to: memetic depth Prose voice Route to: prose style Degradation Signals Quotes summarize chapter events (too direct) No discernible thematic connection (too obscure) Generic voice without position/blindness Reasoning Requirements Standard Reasoning Single epigraph creation Basic perspective definition Simple connection identification Extended Reasoning (ultrathink) Full epigraph series [Why: must create variety and progression] Multi layer design [Why: surface/contextual/ironic/thematic must cohere] Fictional compiler voice [Why: who selects these documents and why] Trigger phrases: "design the complete epigraph series", "create the documentary frame", "layer the meanings" Execution Strategy Sequential (Default) Analyze chapter before choosing perspective Define voice before writing document Draft before calibrating connection Parallelizable Creating multiple epigraphs for different chapters Research into different document types Subagent Candidates Task Agent Type When to Spawn Document research general purpose When modeling on real document types World consistency Explore When checking against existing worldbuilding Context Management Approximate Token Footprint Skill base: ~3k tokens (perspective engine + document types) With process: ~4k tokens With worked example: ~4.5k tokens Context Optimization Focus on current perspective and document type Document type catalog is reference Worked example optional When Context Gets Tight Prioritize: Current perspective, active document type Defer: Full document type catalog, advanced techniques Drop: Worked example, all quality checks Anti Patterns 1. Too Direct Pattern: Quotes that summarize chapter events, documents directly about main characters, contemporary reactions to specific events. Why it fails: Direct commentary removes reader discovery. The power of oblique worldbuilding is inference—readers connect the document to the chapter themselves. Fix: Use second order distance. Find related phenomena