backprop

Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.

By juliusbrussee · 2,592 installs

npx skills add juliusbrussee/cavekit --skill backprop

Source repository · Upstream listing

backprop — bug → spec Plan then execute fixes the code & forgets. SDD fixes the code AND edits spec so recurrence is impossible. That edit is backprop. WHEN TO BACKPROP Test failed at /build verification. User reports bug. Post mortem after production incident. /check flags VIOLATE with root cause found. SIX STEPS 1. TRACE Read failure output / bug report. Find exact file:line of wrong behavior. Name root cause in one caveman sentence. 2. ANALYZE Ask three questions: Would a new §V invariant catch this class of bug? (most common: yes) Is §I wrong — did spec claim shape the code cannot deliver? (sometimes) Is §T wrong — did we build the wrong thing? (rare but real) 3. PROPOSE Draft the spec change. Never skip §B; §V/§I/§T are case by case. Template: Example: 4. GENERATE TEST New invariant without test = lie. Add failing test first. Name test so it cites the invariant: TestV7 RefundIdempotent . 5. VERIFY Fix code. Run test. Must pass. Run full suite. Must not regress. 6. LOG Commit spec edit + test + code fix together. Commit msg: backprop §B.<n + §V.<N : <one line cause . WHAT MAKES A GOOD INVARIANT Testable in code (grep able or assert able). Scoped to a behavior, not a file. Stated positively when possible ( ! hold over ⊥ forbid ). References §I surface where it applies. Bad : V8: code should be correct. Good : V8: ∀ pg query ! params interpolated via driver, ⊥ string concat. WHEN NOT TO ADD §V Bug was purely mechanical typo with no class ( i++ vs i in throwaway). Fix is a one time migration. Root cause is external dep (upgrade deps instead, note in §C). Still append §B entry — record that this failure mode was considered. Future bug with same smell → §B search shows precedent. OUTPUT SHAPE Every backprop run produces: 1. §B entry (always). 2. §V entry (usually). 3. Test file (when §V added). 4. Code fix. 5. One commit. No dashboards. No log files. SPEC.md + git is the full history.