sf-debug

Salesforce debug log analysis and troubleshooting with 100-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user analyzes debug logs, hits governor limits, reads stack traces, or touches .log files from Salesforce orgs. DO NOT TRIGGER when: running Apex tests (use sf-testing), fixing Apex code (use sf-apex), or Agentfo

By jaganpro · 1,463 installs

npx skills add jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-debug

Source repository · Upstream listing

sf debug: Salesforce Debug Log Analysis & Troubleshooting Use this skill when the user needs root cause analysis from debug logs : governor limit diagnosis, stack trace interpretation, slow query investigation, heap / CPU pressure analysis, or a reproduction to fix loop based on log evidence. When This Skill Owns the Task Use sf debug when the work involves: .log files from Salesforce stack traces and exception analysis governor limits SOQL / DML / CPU / heap troubleshooting query plan or performance evidence extracted from logs Delegate elsewhere when the user is: running or repairing Apex tests → [sf testing](../sf testing/SKILL.md) implementing the code fix → [sf apex](../sf apex/SKILL.md) debugging Agentforce session traces / parquet telemetry → [sf ai agentforce observability](../sf ai agentforce observability/SKILL.md) Required Context to Gather First Ask for or infer: org alias failing transaction / user flow / test name approximate timestamp or transaction window user / record / request ID if known whether the goal is diagnosis only or diagnosis + fix loop Recommended Workflow 1. Retrieve logs 2. Analyze in this order 1. entry point and transaction type 2. exceptions / fatal errors 3. governor limits 4. repeated SOQL / DML patterns 5. CPU / heap hotspots 6. callout timing and external failures 3. Classify severity Critical — runtime failure, hard limit, corruption risk Warning — near limit, non selective query, slow path Info — optimization opportunity or hygiene issue 4. Recommend the smallest correct fix Prefer fixes that are: root cause oriented bulk safe testable easy to verify with a rerun Expanded workflow: [references/analysis playbook.md](references/analysis playbook.md) High Signal Issue Patterns Issue Primary signal Default fix direction SOQL in loop repeating SOQL EXECUTE BEGIN in a repeated call path query once, use maps / grouped collections DML in loop repeated DML BEGIN patterns collect rows, bulk DML once Non selective query high rows scanned / poor selectivity add indexed filters, reduce scope CPU pressure CPU usage approaching sync limit reduce algorithmic complexity, cache, async where valid Heap pressure heap usage approaching sync limit stream with SOQL for loops, reduce in memory data Null pointer / fatal error EXCEPTION THROWN / FATAL ERROR guard null assumptions, fix empty query handling Expanded examples: [references/common issues.md](references/common issues.md) Output Format When finishing analysis, report in this order: 1. What failed 2. Where it failed (class / method / line / transaction stage) 3. Why it failed (root cause, not just symptom) 4. How severe it is 5. Recommended fix 6. Verification step Suggested shape: Cross Skill Integration Need Delegate to Reason Implement Apex fix [sf apex](../sf apex/SKILL.md) code change generation / review Reproduce via tests [sf testing](../sf testing/SKILL.md) test execution and coverage loop Deploy fix [sf deploy](../sf deploy/SKILL.md) deployment orchestration Create debugging data [sf data](../sf data/SKILL.md) targeted seed / repro data Reference Map Start here [references/analysis playbook.md](references/analysis playbook.md) [references/common issues.md](references/common issues.md) [references/cli commands.md](references/cli commands.md) Deep references [references/debug log reference.md](references/debug log reference.md) [references/log analysis tools.md](references/log analysis tools.md) [references/benchmarking guide.md](references/benchmarking guide.md) Rubric [references/scoring rubric.md](references/scoring rubric.md) Score Guide Score Meaning 90+ Expert analysis with strong fix guidance 80–89 Good analysis with minor gaps 70–79 Acceptable but may miss secondary issues 60–69 Partial diagnosis only < 60 Incomplete analysis