Token holder chip analysis — deep analysis of holder structure including chip distribution, entry cost, whale/dev/KOL behavior, risk wallets (rat traders, bundlers, snipers), related wallets, smart money signals, and an AI rating based purely on token structure. Use when user asks about holder analy

BEFORE RUNNING ANY COMMAND: Run gmgn cli config check . If exit code is 0, proceed normally. If exit code is 1, run gmgn cli config and show output, then apply the key with gmgn cli config apply <KEY . If unknown option, tell user to run npm install g gmgn cli . IMPORTANT: Always use gmgn cli commands. Do NOT use curl, WebFetch, or visit gmgn.ai. When the user asks to analyze holders for a token, extract chain and address from their message, then run the analysis script below. Also detect the user's language: set LANG to 'zh' if the user wrote in Chinese, 'en' if in English (default 'zh' ). Analysis Script Run the following command, replacing the placeholders with the actual values: FILL IN CHAIN: sol for Solana addresses; for EVM 0x... addresses use auto unless the user explicitly specifies a chain ( bsc / eth / base ) FILL IN LANG: zh if user wrote Chinese, en if English, default zh Output Rule After the script finishes, paste the complete stdout verbatim into your reply — every line, every section, nothing omitted or summarized. Do NOT add any introduction, commentary, or summary before or after the output block. Field Reference All holding percentages the script prints are share of tradeable float ( 1 burn DEX ), not share of total supply. amount percentage from the API is share of total supply; the script re bases it. Because only the top 100 holders are fetched, a float percentage is a floor when those 100 wallets do not cover the whole float ; the footer reports the actual coverage and states which case applies — floors when coverage <99.5%, complete values when the top 100 cover all of it. When burn + DEX leave less than 2% of supply tradeable (typically a launchpad token before migration), the float denominator degenerates: every / float share inflates dust wallets to double digits or 100%. The script detects this, prints a banner with absolute token/USD figures instead, and sets the rating to ⚪ Cannot Assess. The same suppression applies when token holders returns an empty list (token has no active holders left, or upstream stopped indexing it). Every percentage would render 0.00% and every threshold would pass, so the report would otherwise read "✅ Normal — no obvious dump risk". The script prints a no data banner instead, replaces each "none found 🟢" line with ⚪, and rates ⚪ Cannot Assess. "No data" is never reported as "no risk". In both cases no float percentage is printed at all — every one renders as n/a ( 无法评估 ) and every percentage flag renders ⚪. Printing the number with a caveat was not enough: a divide by zero float puts hold 100.00% and hold 0.00% in the same report, and a reader skimming past the banner reads Rat Trader 1 hold 100.00% as a finding. Wallet counts, token amounts, USD values, and market caps still print — they do not pass through float share . Percentages on a total supply basis also still print ( burn , DEX , float share itself, and the chip quality buckets), because those denominators are unaffected. Holder object key fields Field Type Meaning address string Wallet address balance float Current token balance amount percentage float Fraction of total supply (0–1). Multiply by 100 for %. usd value float Current USD value of holdings avg cost float Average buy price per token unrealized pnl float Unrealized PnL ratio (0.5 = +50%) unrealized profit float Unrealized PnL in USD realized profit float Realized PnL in USD profit float Total PnL in USD (realized + unrealized). Also a valid order by field. buy tx count cur int Buy transactions since token creation sell tx count cur int Sell transactions since token creation sell amount percentage float Fraction of total buys that have been sold. Drives the accumulating/distributing verdict. sell volume cur float USD volume sold since token creation sell amount cur float Token amount sold since token creation history transfer out amount float Token amount transferred out (not sold) history transfer out income float USD value of transferred out tokens token transfer out object {address} — recipient of a transfer out. Used to detect dev sock puppets when the recipient is itself in the top 100. name string Wallet display name if known start holding at int Unix timestamp of first buy addr type int 0=normal wallet, 1=burn/dead, 2=DEX/pool maker token tags list bundler , rat trader , sniper , whale , top holder , transfer in , dev team , creator tags list smart degen , pump smart , renowned , fresh wallet , wash trader , kol native balance string Raw native token balance. May be a decimal string — parse with float , not int . Denominator is known only for sol (1e9) and bsc / eth / base (1e18). native transfer object {from address, amount, timestamp} — how wallet was funded. Drives 关联资金. twitter name string Twitter handle if known Created tokens response fields Field Meaning inner count Unmigrated token count open count Migrated token count tokens[].market cap Current market cap in USD tokens[].symbol Token symbol tokens[].is open true = migrated creator ath info.ath mc All time high MC across all created tokens creator ath info.ath token Token address of the ATH token creator ath info.token symbol Symbol of the ATH token creator ath info.token name Name of the ATH token Rating Standard All thresholds below are share of tradeable float , matching the script. They are not comparable to GMGN's own UI, which reports share of total supply — on a token whose LP holds 56% of supply, the same wallet reads 2.4× higher here. Entry timing pressure (批次浮盈/出货) does NOT affect the overall rating — it only affects section display. Rating (ZH) Rating (EN) Emoji Condition 无法评估 Cannot Assess ⚪ Tradeable float <2% of supply, or upstream returned zero holders (all percentage rules suppressed; dev sock puppet still escalates to 🔴) 不建议买 Not Recommended 🔴 Any: rat traders 5% / largest wallet 10% / dev sock puppet 谨慎参与 Caution ⚠️ ≥2 of: Dev still holding 1% / airdrop 20% / risk wallets 35% / linked 15% 可轻仓 Light Position 🟡 Exactly 1 of above warns 正常参与 Normal ✅ None of the above Per metric flag thresholds Metric 🔴 🟡 🟢 Top10 concentration 60% 40% ≤40% Top20 concentration 75% 55% ≤55% Airdropped chips (never bought) 25% 10% ≤10% Risk wallets 35% 15% ≤15% Linked funding 25% 10% ≤10% Zero balance wallets — 10% ≤10% Diamond hands invert (more is better) and use their own emoji set: ✅ 60% / 🟡 35% / ⚠️ ≤35%. Diamond hands require buy tx count cur 0 — a wallet that never bought has no cost to hold through, so zero cost airdrop recipients are reported separately as "空降未动 / Idle airdrop" rather than being credited as diamond hands. Linked funding is escalated to at least 🟡 whenever any group was funded within 60s, regardless of size — scripted batch funding is a structural signal, not a magnitude one. Chip quality (footer) Three mutually exclusive buckets over the chips held by observed wallets (denominator is normal pct , i.e. total supply basis, not float): bought in with no risk tag / zero cost airdrop / risk tagged . They are reported separately rather than collapsed into one "healthy chips" number, because a risk tag means a proven bad address while zero cost airdrop only means unknown provenance. Headline flag, first match wins: 🔴 risk tagged 30% · 🟢 clean ≥50% · 🟡 clean ≥30% · 🟡 when zero cost airdrop accounts for ≥80% of the non clean remainder · 🔴 otherwise. So an airdrop distributed token reads 🟡 with its composition spelled out, not "healthy chips 0.0% 🔴". The composition is total supply based, so it survives a degenerate float and its three percentages still print — but the headline flag is neutralized to ⚪ (and the chips' share of supply appended) whenever the rating is ⚪ Cannot Assess, since a 🔴/🟢 verdict over dust level chips would contradict the rating above it. Supported Chains sol , bsc , base , eth , robinhood , arc , stable Notes balance = 1 threshold avoids dust false positives when identifying dev holdings SOL native balance is in lamports (÷1e9); bsc / eth / base are in wei (÷1e18). Decimals for arc / stable / robinhood are unconfirmed, so the buying power section reports "not assessed" on those chains rather than printing a converted figure that would be wrong. Holder buying power needs a live native token price, fetched with token info on the wrapped native address ( So111…1112 / WBNB / WETH / Base WETH). When that call fails, the section falls back to native units and prints no USD figure. total supply is estimated as the median of balance / amount percentage across normal wallets cur price is estimated as the median of usd value / balance across normal wallets Entry MC = total supply avg cost , shown alongside unrealized PnL for every Top5 wallet Top5 displays Twitter name when available; else first4...last4 format Risk wallet subtotals are per category and can exceed the deduped total; the script prints how many wallets carry more than one risk tag when that happens. creator ath info.ath mc can lag behind the token's current MC after a fast pump (upstream ath price has been seen equal to price 24h ). The script cannot recompute it, so when the reported ATH sits more than 5% below the current MC it prints a staleness warning next to the figure instead of presenting it as the dev's peak.

gmgn-holder-analysis