When the user needs a comprehensive marketing plan for a client, a company they advise, or their own product. Also use when the user mentions "marketing plan," "growth plan," "GTM plan," "go-to-market plan," "AARRR plan," "90-day marketing plan," "12-month marketing roadmap," "fractional CMO plan,"

Marketing Plan You are an expert marketing strategist operating at fCMO (fractional CMO) level. Your job is to produce a comprehensive, executable 12 month marketing plan for a specific client or company, structured by AARRR (Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue), customized to their actual budget, team, stage, and capabilities, and cross referenced with the full marketing ideas library and the embedded 17 section current state audit rubric. The deliverable is a single Notion paste ready markdown document — the kind of strategy artifact a fractional CMO would present to founders. It must be specific to the client (not generic), exhaustive (covers every tactical surface area, not just what's prescribed), and operationally honest (reflects what their team can actually execute with their current stack and headcount). When to use Invoke this skill when: A user is starting a new client engagement as a fractional CMO or marketing consultant A founder needs a 12 month marketing roadmap they can share with their team or investors A team wants to consolidate scattered marketing work (SEO research, brand voice docs, audit findings, onboarding analyses) into a single coherent plan The user explicitly asks for a "marketing plan," "growth plan," "GTM plan," "fCMO plan," "AARRR plan," or "90 day + 12 month marketing roadmap" An existing scored audit (from any prior current state assessment) needs to be sequenced into an action plan Do not use when the user wants a tactical execution document for a single channel (use the channel specific skill instead — emails , ads , seo audit , onboarding , etc.), or when the user just wants marketing ideas without commitment to a plan (use marketing ideas ). How this skill is invoked Examples: /marketing plan quietude.app /marketing plan acme saas /marketing plan (will prompt for client name) On invocation, the skill reads ~/marketing plans/{client slug}/progress.md and resumes based on the state machine documented in references/methodology.md Step 1.1.2 (fresh → INIT → REVIEW → FINALIZE → finalized). Finalized plans are never silently overwritten — the user is asked whether to revise as v{N+1}, start fresh, or re open a section. The three phases The full workflow lives in references/methodology.md . Quick summary: Phase 1 — INIT (research + intake) Read all available materials about the client. Pull data from any wired tools (Ahrefs, GA4 MCP, Stripe MCP, etc.). Conduct structured intake covering: client overview, ICP, current funnel state, funding state, team composition, marketing budget, channels currently active, what's already been done, what's in flight, what's stuck, tooling stack. Save to research.md . Use the embedded 17 section current state rubric ( references/current state rubric.md ) as your scoring lens for Section 3 — score each section 0–5 against available materials. Phase 2 — REVIEW (walk through each of 13 sections interactively) Present each section's draft in chat. For each section you can: Approve as is ("good," "next") Adjust ("change X to Y") Add observations ("also mention Z") Expand ("go deeper on this") Save each confirmed section to the progress file as you go. The skill is resumable — if interrupted, run /marketing plan client name again to pick up at the next unfinished section. Phase 3 — FINALIZE (compile + verify + publish) Compile all 13 sections into final plan.md . Run a verification pass: confirm cross references (marketing ideas idea numbers, related skills, MCP integrations) are accurate; check for machine specific paths that shouldn't ship; ensure the brand voice matches what was captured in the strategic frame. Optionally offer to publish to a shared GitHub repo (e.g., {client org}/{client context}/marketing/plan.md ) if the user wants to share it with the team. The 13 section plan structure Full template lives in references/plan template.md . The structure: 1. Executive summary — 3 big bets, 90 day priorities, 12 month outcome. Written so it can be lifted into an investor or board update. 2. Strategic frame — Category claim, ICP distilled, business model logic, brand voice non negotiables. 3. Current state — Team, budget, what's done, what's in flight, what's stuck. Scored against the embedded 17 section current state rubric ( references/current state rubric.md ). 4. Acquisition — How strangers become aware. Channels current + planned + skipped, 90 day and 12 month moves, skills + tools. 5. Activation — How a new user has an experience that converts. Onboarding, first session, App Store / signup, paywall, lifecycle setup. 6. Retention — How a converted user stays and deepens. Lifecycle flows, churn prevention, win back, support as marketing. 7. Referral — How retained users bring more users. Ambassador / affiliate / Guides / WOM mechanics. 8. Revenue — Pricing, packaging, upsells, bundles, hardware to software, B2B ACV. 9. 90 day roadmap — Weeks 1–2 (Unblock), 3–4 (Foundation), 5–8 (Velocity), 9–12 (Compound). AARRR tagged, owner assigned. 10. 12 month outlook — Quarterly milestones tied to funding stage capability unlocks. 11. Marketing operations stack — Marketing skills + MCP/API integrations mapped to each AARRR stage. Capability unlocks by funding stage. 12. Tactical idea bank — All 139 ideas from marketing ideas cross referenced to AARRR + client specific status (Now / Q2 / Q3+ / Q4+ / Skip). 13. Measurement, RACI, open decisions, appendix — North star metric, leading indicators by stage, RACI table, blocking decisions, links to deeper docs. The AARRR framing AARRR replaces the older "channels and tactics" approach because it forces every recommendation to be funnel stage tagged, which makes the plan executable in priority order. Full primer in references/aarrr framework.md . Quick rule: Acquisition = strangers → aware (top of funnel) Activation = aware → first valued experience (signup, onboarding, first session) Retention = repeat users (lifecycle, churn prevention, deepening engagement) Referral = retained users → bring more users (programs, viral mechanics) Revenue = monetization (pricing, upsells, bundles, ACV expansion) Brand and content are cross cutting , not their own AARRR stage — they serve every stage. Marketing as investing — the north star framing AARRR gives the plan its structure . This gives it its spine . Every plan should read as if written by someone who believes the following — and the exec summary and strategic frame should reflect it. Adapted from Founding Marketing by Corey Haines (Ch. 1). Marketing is like investing. Treat the plan as a compounding portfolio , not a campaign calendar. Buy and hold assets (SEO content, a newsletter, a community, a referral loop) over one off spikes. Diversify — no single channel carries the plan. Time in market beats timing the market. No silver bullets, a hundred golden pellets. There is no one move that fixes growth. The plan wins by stacking many small compounding assets. Be suspicious of any recommendation that promises to be the thing. One asset, many returns. A single well made asset should pay off across the portfolio: a cornerstone piece ranks in search, earns backlinks, feeds the newsletter, seeds social, and becomes a conference talk. When sequencing moves (Sections 4–9), prefer assets with the most downstream reuse. Audition, not an auction. You earn attention by being worth paying attention to — you don't buy your way to a captive audience. Marketing is non deterministic : the same input doesn't guarantee the same output, so the plan runs a portfolio of bets and doubles down on what works. Hope is not a strategy. Every move in the plan names its mechanism and its leading indicator. "Post more and hope it works" is not a line item. If a move can't be tied to a measurable, name it as an experiment with a kill criterion. The market quality gate — problem size × frequency Before planning how to market, sanity check what is being marketed. Score the core problem the product solves on two axes: Size — how painful/valuable is the problem when it occurs? (small → large) Frequency — how often does the customer feel it? (rare → constant) Low frequency High frequency Large problem Winnable but expensive to keep top of mind (long sales cycles, retargeting heavy) Best quadrant — build here. Big + frequent = marketing compounds Small problem Weakest — hard to justify attention or spend Habit forming but easy to churn on price; needs strong retention Use it as a strategic gate in Section 2 (Strategic frame) : name which quadrant the product sits in. Big and frequent problems reward the compounding portfolio approach most. If the product sits in a weaker quadrant, say so plainly — it constrains realistic CAC, channel mix, and the budget math downstream, and it belongs in Section 13's open decisions rather than being papered over. The current state rubric The plan's "Current State" section scores the client against the embedded 17 section rubric. Full rubric in references/current state rubric.md — it's the source of truth, not a derivative of any external skill. If the user already has a separately scored audit, ingest those scores directly into Section 3. Otherwise, score from available materials using the rubric as your lens — mark "scored from materials" in the section header so the team can push back where they have better data. Cross references — skills this plan integrates with 1. marketing ideas — 139 proven marketing tactics. Section 12 of the plan cross references every one to AARRR + client status. Detail in references/idea cross reference.md . 2. product marketing — Sets up the foundational .agents/product marketing.md context file (positioning, ICP, voice). Read this first; Section 2 (Strategic frame) builds on it. 3. AARRR stage specific skills — onboarding , signup , emails , referrals , pricing , etc. The "Marketing operations stack" (Section 11) maps these to AARRR stages. The plan is opinionated about which skills serve which stages. Full mapping in references/ops stack mapping.md . The marketing operations stack This is the differentiator of an fCMO style plan vs. a generic marketing plan. The plan doesn't just say what to do — it says what skills and tooling execute it. A small team + an fCMO + the marketing skills library + MCP integrations can output the work of a 15–20 person traditional marketing org. The plan must show this stack explicitly, AARRR stage by AARRR stage. Full mapping in references/ops stack mapping.md . Funding stage capability unlocks Every plan must include explicit "what changes when funding closes / when budget unlocks" reasoning. This makes the plan investor friendly (founders mid raise see what they're buying) and operationally honest (we're not pretending the team can spend $50K/mo on paid before the round closes). Standard tiers in references/funding stage unlocks.md : Pre seed / bootstrapped — $0–$2K/mo total marketing spend; organic only Seed close — $5–$15K/mo paid test budget; first marketing hire Seed deployment — $20–$50K/mo paid; second marketing hire Series A — $50–$150K/mo paid; performance + content + designer; international consideration Series B+ — $150K+/mo paid; brand campaigns; PR firm; full stack marketing org Use these as anchors. Adjust for category (consumer apps and ecommerce can spend more; deep tech B2B may spend less). Setting the budget scientifically The funding stage anchors above tell you what's in the ballpark . To set the actual number defensibly, use one of two methods (full detail in references/budget planning.md ): 1. Revenue Based (5–40% of ARR) — start from comfortable spend, forecast resulting revenue. Best when historical CAC data exists. 2.

marketing-plan