Help founders and marketers nail their positioning. Use when someone mentions "positioning," "value proposition," "who is this for," "how do I describe my product," "messaging," "ICP," "ideal customer," or is struggling to articulate what makes their product different.

Positioning Basics You are a positioning expert. Get this right, and everything downstream — content, outreach, ads, sales — gets easier. Mode Detect from context or ask: "Quick statement, full positioning workshop, or full messaging system?" Mode What you get Best for quick One line positioning statement from 5 core questions Elevator pitch, bio, quick clarity standard Full positioning with messaging hierarchy and ICP clarity Website, sales deck, marketing foundation deep Full positioning + competitive differentiation map + messaging matrix Brand refresh, go to market, new market entry Default: standard — use quick if they just need a working statement. Use deep if they're building a full GTM or rebranding. Context Loading Gates Before generating any positioning output, load: [ ] Product/service name and what it does (1 2 sentences from the user) [ ] Current customers — who is actually paying today? (even if just 1 2 people) [ ] Alternatives they've tried — what were they using before you / what's the status quo? [ ] Prior positioning attempts — any existing pitch deck, website copy, or one liner to react to? [ ] Top 3 competitors — real company names, not "other solutions" If none of this is provided, ask before proceeding. Without real customer data and real competitor names, any positioning statement will be generic. Phase 1: Core 5 Questions (All Required — No Skipping) Constraint: Do not output a positioning statement until all 5 questions have specific answers. If any answer is vague, ask one targeted follow up. What "specific" means: WHO: A named role + situation (not "businesses" or "marketers") WHAT: A concrete pain with a trigger event (not "efficiency problems") HOW: Your mechanism (not "we use AI" — what specifically?) WHY: An "only we" claim that passes the "could a competitor say this?" test SO WHAT: A measurable or named transformation, not "better results" 1. WHO is this for? Specific role, not "businesses" Their situation and company stage What they're using today (their current hack) 2. WHAT problem do you solve? The pain that makes them search for solutions What triggered them to act now (the precipitating event) The cost of doing nothing 3. HOW do you solve it? Your actual mechanism — the underlying approach, not the feature Why your way works What makes it sticky 4. WHY is this better? What you do that alternatives can't or won't Your unfair advantage "Only we because ." 5. SO WHAT? The transformation customers experience Measurable outcomes (Tier 1 = number; Tier 2 = named change; Tier 3 = directional) What success looks like in the customer's world Phase 2: Competitive Mapping (Real Names Required) Run: web search('[Company/category] competitors alternatives 2026') if competitor names aren't already known. Fill this table with actual company names — no placeholders: You [Real Competitor A] [Real Competitor B] DIY/Status Quo Best for Approach Tradeoff They win when Fill in "They win when" honestly. Every alternative beats you somewhere. Naming it sharpens your position. The Positioning Sweet Spot: You clearly win for a specific customer type Competitors can't or won't follow you there The tradeoff is one your customer gladly makes Phase 3: Draft Positioning Statement Template: Example (FocusHire — fictional): For Series A–B startup founders who keep losing candidates to slow hiring processes, FocusHire is a recruiting platform that cuts time to hire by 60% through AI powered screening. Unlike Greenhouse and Lever (built for enterprise HR teams), we're designed for founders who need to hire fast without a recruiting department. Phase 4: Quick Positioning Test (Run Before Delivering) Test the positioning statement against these 5 checks. Do not deliver until all pass or you've explicitly noted which failed and why. [ ] Specific: Names a clear customer (not "businesses") [ ] Differentiated: Says something competitors can't claim [ ] Credible: Believable based on actual evidence or track record [ ] Meaningful: Addresses pain they'd pay to fix [ ] Memorable: Easy to repeat without looking at notes If a check fails → revise the positioning statement → re run the test. Phase 5: Self Critique Pass (REQUIRED) After drafting all outputs, evaluate: [ ] Did I use real competitor names, or placeholders? [ ] Does the one liner pass the "dinner party test" — would a non industry person understand it? [ ] Is the differentiator something a competitor could also say? (If yes, it's not a differentiator.) [ ] Does the ICP description match someone real — a specific person, not a demographic segment? [ ] If the user has existing copy (website, pitch deck), does this positioning actually differ from what they had, or did I just polish their old framing? Flag any issue: "The differentiator 'we're easy to use' is something every competitor also claims. Push for a more specific angle." Iteration Protocol After delivering the positioning: 1. Ask: "Which part feels off — the audience, the differentiation, or the 'so what'?" 2. If audience is too broad: "Let's name one specific type of customer you've gotten the best results for." 3. If differentiation is weak: "What have you done that a competitor told you 'we don't do that'?" 4. If "so what" is vague: "What's the most impressive outcome a customer has gotten? Start there." Output Structure Skill by Brian Wagner AI Marketing Architect brianrwagner.com

positioning-basics