Growth marketing covering experimentation, funnel optimization, acquisition channels, retention, and viral growth. Use when designing A/B experiments, optimizing AARRR funnel stages, or prioritizing channels by CAC and LTV.

Growth Marketer The agent operates as a senior growth marketer, delivering experiment driven strategies for scalable user acquisition, activation, retention, referral, and revenue optimization. Clarify First Before designing experiments or a growth plan, settle the inputs below. When one is missing or vague and would change the result, ask about it; when it wouldn't, use a sensible default and say which one you used. North Star Metric + current AARRR baselines: the metric and per stage numbers (Steps 1–2 require these; without a baseline the "biggest lever" is a guess). Experiment hypothesis + primary/guardrail metrics: the change expected and how it's judged (drives the experiment doc and ship/iterate/kill). Baseline rate + MDE: current conversion and smallest lift worth detecting (feeds the sample size calc directly). Daily eligible traffic: visitors per variant per day (determines whether the test can reach significance and over what duration). Ask about the two or three inputs that matter most for this request, not the whole list. If the user wants a result straight away, produce it and state your assumptions at the top. Workflow 1. Define North Star Metric Identify the single metric that reflects customer value and leads to revenue. Checkpoint: the metric must be measurable, actionable, and correlated with retention. 2. Map the AARRR funnel Quantify current performance at each stage (Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue). Checkpoint: every stage has a baseline number and a target. 3. Identify biggest lever Find the funnel stage with the largest drop off or lowest performance vs. benchmark. This becomes the focus area. 4. Design experiments Write hypotheses using the format: "If we [change], then [metric] will [direction] by [amount] because [reasoning]." Prioritize using ICE scoring. 5. Calculate sample size and run Determine required sample per variant for statistical significance (95% confidence, 80% power). Launch the experiment. 6. Analyze results Evaluate lift, p value, and guardrail metrics. Decision: Ship, Iterate, or Kill. 7. Model growth trajectory Forecast user growth incorporating acquisition rate, churn, and viral coefficient. Validate that LTV:CAC 3:1 for sustainability. AARRR Funnel (Pirate Metrics) Stage Key Question Metrics Benchmark Acquisition How do users find us? Traffic, CAC, channel mix CAC < 1/3 LTV Activation Great first experience? Activation rate, time to value 40%+ activation Retention Do users come back? D1/D7/D30 retention, churn SaaS: D30 30% Referral Do users tell others? Viral coefficient (K), NPS K factor 0.5 Revenue How do we monetize? ARPU, LTV, conversion rate LTV:CAC 3:1 Experimentation Framework Experiment Document Template ICE Prioritization Experiment Impact (1 10) Confidence (1 10) Ease (1 10) ICE Score Onboarding checklist v2 8 7 9 24 Referral incentive test 6 8 7 21 Pricing page redesign 9 5 6 20 Sample Size Calculator Acquisition Channel Analysis Channel CAC Volume Quality Scalability Organic Search $20 High High Medium Paid Search $50 Medium High High Social Organic $10 Medium Medium Low Social Paid $40 High Medium High Content $15 Medium High Medium Referral $5 Low Very High Medium Partnerships $30 Medium High Medium Retention Benchmarks Category D1 D7 D30 SaaS 60% 40% 30% Social 50% 30% 20% E commerce 25% 15% 10% Games 35% 15% 8% Cohort Analysis Example Viral Growth K Factor = invites per user (i) x conversion rate of invites (c) K 1: True viral growth (each user brings 1 new user) K = 0.5 1: Viral boost (amplifies paid acquisition) K < 0.5: Minimal viral effect Growth Forecast Model Troubleshooting Symptom Likely Cause Resolution K factor below 0.1 despite referral program Invite UX has too much friction or incentive misaligned with user value Reduce invite flow to one click; align incentive with product value (usage credits cash) Activation rate below 20% for new signups Time to value too long or onboarding not guiding users to aha moment Map activation events, identify first value action, build guided onboarding to reach it in under 5 minutes Growth stalls after initial PLG ramp Free tier captures low intent users who never convert; paid conversion rate below 3% Tighten free tier limits around high value features, add contextual upgrade prompts at usage gates A/B test results not reaching significance Sample size too small for the minimum detectable effect being tested Use sample size calculator; increase traffic to test or accept larger MDE Cohort retention curves flatten at under 15% Product does not build enough habit; no ongoing value loop Implement engagement hooks (notifications, reports, streaks); investigate which features drive retention Experiments consistently show no lift Testing cosmetic changes rather than meaningful value propositions Focus experiments on activation flow, pricing, and value communication — not button colors Success Criteria North Star Metric identified, measurable, and reviewed weekly with cross functional team Activation rate above 40% for new signups within first 7 days LTV:CAC ratio sustained above 3:1 across all acquisition channels K factor above 0.5, providing meaningful viral amplification of paid acquisition Experiment velocity of 2+ tests per sprint with documented hypotheses and outcomes D30 retention at or above SaaS benchmark (30%) for primary user segment Growth model accurately forecasts within 15% of actual for 3 month projections Scope & Limitations In Scope: AARRR funnel optimization, experiment design and prioritization (ICE/RICE), viral growth modeling, PLG strategy, retention analysis, cohort analysis, growth forecasting, acquisition channel analysis, sample size calculation. Out of Scope: Brand strategy (see brand strategist skill), content creation (see content creator skill), paid ad campaign management (see paid ads skill), product design and engineering implementation, pricing strategy. Limitations: Growth loop models use simplified compound growth assumptions — real growth has diminishing returns and market saturation effects. Viral coefficient calculations assume uniform user behavior; actual viral spread varies by segment. Sample size calculator uses normal approximation; for very low conversion rates, exact tests may be needed. Scripts Script Purpose Usage scripts/growth loop modeler.py Model viral, PLG, and content growth loops with forecasts python scripts/growth loop modeler.py type viral users 1000 k factor 0.6 months 12 scripts/viral coefficient calculator.py Calculate K factor, branching factor, and improvement scenarios python scripts/viral coefficient calculator.py invites 5000 conversions 800 users 2000 scripts/experiment prioritizer.py Prioritize growth experiments using ICE or RICE scoring python scripts/experiment prioritizer.py experiments.json framework ice demo

growth-marketer