Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implemen

Codex Delegate You are the orchestrator . This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate implementer — the OpenAI Codex CLI — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write the brief and own the judgment; Codex does the typing in its own sandbox; you verify and commit. Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell command and read a file, so it works the same whether you are Claude Code, OpenCode with a selected model, or any comparable agent. (It is designed for and run on Claude Code; treat other orchestrators as designed for, not yet proven.) When NOT to use this The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it. The codex CLI is not installed or not authenticated (run codex login ). You want to write the code yourself, or you only need a review (use Codex's own review command). Prerequisites (check once) 1. codex version succeeds. If not, install ( npm i g @openai/codex ) and codex login . 2. Confirm which codex is on PATH. Multiple installs are common (e.g. a current npm/nvm copy and a stale Homebrew one). command v codex shows the active one and codex version its version — an old binary predates flags this skill relies on ( codex exec json , o , exec resume ). The relay also records the version it ran into result.json , so a stale binary is visible after the fact. 3. You are in (or will point cd at) the target git repository. The loop Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical. 1. Write the brief Codex sees only the text you send — no repo memory, no chat history, no shared context. Everything the task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the project's actual gate commands (discover them from the repo's CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/Makefile — do not assume), and a report contract. Tell Codex it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per brief. Full guidance and a template: [references/writing the brief.md](references/writing the brief.md). 2. Dispatch Send the brief to Codex with the bundled helper. It wraps codex exec , captures the run, and writes a structured result.json — so your only job is "run a command, read a file." ( <skill dir below is this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this SKILL.md , i.e. the directory you loaded the skill from. Claude Code prints it as "Base directory for this skill" when the skill loads; on other orchestrators use that same directory — if unsure where it landed, run find ~ name relay.mjs path ' codex delegate ' and substitute the directory above it.) The helper defaults to a write capable ( workspace write ) sandbox and writes its artifacts to a temp dir, so the repo under review stays clean. It never commits — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the result.json shape: [references/dispatch and poll.md](references/dispatch and poll.md). 3. Wait for completion The helper blocks until Codex finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume when it returns: Claude Code: run the Bash call with run in background: true ; you are notified on completion. Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll the result file — … & in bash/zsh (including Git Bash/WSL), or your shell's equivalent ( Start Job in PowerShell, start /b in cmd). The run is done when result.json exists with a status . (A pre run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead exits with code 2 and a stderr message and writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A missing codex binary exits 127 but does write a result.json with status codex unavailable .) Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when result.json is written and the process has exited. Read the working tree, not a status line. The implementer's full report is the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers). 4. Review — do not trust the self report Codex's result.json includes its own summary and gate claims. Re verify, don't accept: Re run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1). Never take "gates passed" on faith. Read the diff against the brief: did Codex do what was asked, nothing more (scope creep) and nothing less? touchedFiles in the result is your starting point. Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed (clean code guard, test guard, etc. from guard skills ) — this skill produces the work; those skills judge it. For schema/migration changes, round trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references. Full checklist: [references/review and land.md](references/review and land.md). 5. Land it Because Codex's sandbox cannot reliably write .git (it varies by version, OS, and path), the orchestrator commits. Only after the gates pass and the diff holds: Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message. If it needs changes, send a delta brief with session <threadId from the prior result.json (use resume last only when no thread id is available), and review again. Read only second opinions The relay doubles as a clean way to get an adversarial second opinion with no write risk: dispatch read only with a brief that lists the agreed points, then each contested point with both positions, and ask Codex to defend or concede each — deliverable in its final message, touching no files. Any delegation skill whose implementer offers a read only mode supports the same use, but check how hard that mode's guarantee is first: Codex's sandbox enforces it, while Grok's is best effort and only flagged after the fact ( readOnlyViolation ) — for those implementers, verify touchedFiles came back empty instead of assuming no edits. Authorization model Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing verified, gate passing work is the agreed contract — that is the whole point. Two limits on that mandate: surface, don't absorb (report Codex's design decisions, defensible but unasked turns, and non blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask — don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment is in [references/review and land.md](references/review and land.md). If you have the openai codex plugin The official openai codex Claude Code plugin is excellent and complementary — codex delegate builds on the same codex CLI, it doesn't replace the plugin. They point in different directions: The plugin's codex:codex rescue agent is a forwarder : it hands one task to Codex and returns the output. It deliberately does not poll, review, or commit. The plugin's review command and stop review gate run the inverse direction: Codex reviews your work . codex delegate is the orchestration loop in the other direction : you drive Codex to implement across one task or a queue, and you review and land each result. That loop — brief → dispatch → poll → review → commit, with the orchestrator owning the commit — is what the plugin leaves to you, and what this skill encodes. If you have the plugin installed, its companion CLI is an optional alternative dispatch backend; the bundled relay.mjs is the default because it adds no install of its own beyond the codex binary (Node and git , which the relay also needs, are prerequisites for every skill here). References [references/writing the brief.md](references/writing the brief.md) — how to write a brief Codex can execute blind: structure, XML blocks, the report contract, embedding the real gate commands. [references/dispatch and poll.md](references/dispatch and poll.md) — relay.mjs flags, the result.json contract, backgrounding per orchestrator, and recovery when a run misbehaves. [references/review and land.md](references/review and land.md) — the review checklist, the commit boundary, and the exact session rework cycle. [references/multi task queues.md](references/multi task queues.md) — running a sequential queue: carrying constraints forward, progress tracking, and the end of run coherence check.

codex-delegate