Operate execution flow across GitHub and Linear by triaging issues and pull requests, linking active work, and keeping GitHub public-facing while Linear remains the internal execution layer. Use when the user wants backlog control, PR triage, or GitHub-to-Linear coordination.

Project Flow Ops This skill turns disconnected GitHub issues, PRs, and Linear tasks into one execution flow. Use it when the problem is coordination, not coding. When to Use Triage open PR or issue backlogs Decide what belongs in Linear vs what should remain GitHub only Link active GitHub work to internal execution lanes Classify PRs into merge, port/rebuild, close, or park Audit whether review comments, CI failures, or stale issues are blocking execution Operating Model GitHub is the public and community truth Linear is the internal execution truth for active scheduled work Not every GitHub issue needs a Linear issue Create or update Linear only when the work is: active delegated scheduled cross functional important enough to track internally Core Workflow 1. Read the public surface first Gather: GitHub issue or PR state author and branch status review comments CI status linked issues 2. Classify the work Every item should end up in one of these states: State Meaning Merge self contained, policy compliant, ready Port/Rebuild useful idea, but should be manually re landed inside ECC Close wrong direction, stale, unsafe, or duplicated Park potentially useful, but not scheduled now 3. Decide whether Linear is warranted Create or update Linear only if: execution is actively planned multiple repos or workstreams are involved the work needs internal ownership or sequencing the issue is part of a larger program lane Do not mirror everything mechanically. 4. Keep the two systems consistent When work is active: GitHub issue/PR should say what is happening publicly Linear should track owner, priority, and execution lane internally When work ships or is rejected: post the public resolution back to GitHub mark the Linear task accordingly Review Rules Never merge from title, summary, or trust alone; use the full diff External source features should be rebuilt inside ECC when they are valuable but not self contained CI red means classify and fix or block; do not pretend it is merge ready If the real blocker is product direction, say so instead of hiding behind tooling Output Format Return: Good Use Cases "Audit the open PR backlog and tell me what to merge vs rebuild" "Map GitHub issues into our ECC 1.x and ECC 2.0 program lanes" "Check whether this needs a Linear issue or should stay GitHub only"

project-flow-ops